Home
Advertisement
Worldspace rebrands itself | Print |  Forward
 
Chris Forrester, on 16-07-2008

worldspacelogo.jpgWorldspace, after 10 years of investment in its brand, is modifying itself to be known as “1Worldspace”. Its new web-site (at www.1worldspace.com) is partly live. Worldspace has also responded to our recent pieces about the broadcaster.  

Judith Prior, Worldspace’s SVP/corporate communications, has helpfully compiled a full dossier on Rapid TV News’ writings on her employers, and we are happy to give readers her responses. One element she has not denied or indeed commented on was the major thrust of our recent story which was that Worldspace’s cash resources are so modest that they are not paying senior staff.

However, Ms Prior is right to remind us of the latest position regarding their India activity. “We continue to strongly believe in the India market for satellite radio,” said her statement. “We have opted to pull back marketing spend in the region until the necessary terrestrial repeater licensing has been granted/issued. This has been stated and cited publicly in our quarterly results calls by Noah Samara, and therefore available in the transcripts that result from those calls.” Ms Prior is correct, and Worldspace needs to find a local partner to take 26% of a local Worldspace company in order to pursue those India licenses.

Worldspace also argues with a statement we made regarding the costs of developing their European plan. We used comments from a highly-placed independent source within the European satellite radio industry, who quoted US cellular expert Craig McCaw who has stated that it might cost $800m to roll out a satellite-based network in the USA transmitting data, telematics and similar services. Ms Prior says Worldspace’s costs in regard to terrestrial audio repeaters alone for Italy will be $20 million, and commensurate for each other European country.

As regards the numerous Class Action lawsuits pending against Worldspace, Ms Prior states the allegations “question the accuracy of our India subscriber count. We have said repeatedly that the company stands by the counts and will defend the lawsuit vigorously.”

Rapid TV News, again quoting an industry insider, pointed out that Worldspace’s satellites were hardly now state-of-the art in regards to design or functionality. Worldspace’s comments are: “The two innovative WorldSpace satellites that are in orbit today, provide excellent coverage, crystal clear programming and the AfriStar satellite is performing magnificently in tests using the new ETSI standard in conjunction with our newly-built terrestrial network in Milan, as we continue activity surrounding the introduction of services in Italy. Indeed, engineers representing certain potential customers who have had US satellite radio experience have reported to us following drive tests of our system in Milan that our performance exceeds the US performance.” 

This is good news for Worldspace, and their Italian partners. We at Rapid TV News look forward to hearing more of the promised 2009 launch of a Worldspace – or 1Worldspace – service in Italy. We also await more news on Worldspace’s refinancing, cash injection, fresh partnerships and progress generally. As we have stated many times, we want satellite radio to be a success over Europe. But there are plenty of acknowledged satellite experts who are extremely negative on the prospects of European sat-radio and we could easily cite them. As founder Noah Samara told his staff last week, Worldspace needs fresh cash and execution. We agree.

Users' Comments (2)
Posted by capvermell, on 18-07-2008,
microndas, 
 
I think most people are negative about Worldspace's prospects due to the very limited number of radio channels (40 or may be 200 with newer compression technology and AAC+) that the Worldspace Afristar satellite can carry. 
 
How will that compete with over 10,000 radio stations available on the internet, especially now that mobile internet is starting to become cheaper in most Western countries. Of course in Africa there is still a technological need for something like Worldspace but sadly nobody there has any money there to pay for such a service.......................
 
» Report this comment to administrator
» Reply to this comment...

Posted by micro ondas, on 17-07-2008,
If you were working in space industry, you should know that we are speaking here about long-term investissements. When a standard has been defined and cost a lot, it is used for many years, it is not as cell phones... 
 
So before qualifying satellites as outdated, be aware of what you are speaking about... do you speak about performance or life expectancy ?
 
» Report this comment to administrator
» Reply to this comment...

Add your comment



mXcomment 1.0.7 © 2007-2008 - visualclinic.fr
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved